🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange made a bold forecast – not just the winner citywide, and precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in the city, has spent more than ten years in left-leaning activism and has become something of a well-known figure this year for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He published his extremely precise forecast map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate would win although missing Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He has a flair for clever terms. He pointed out, for instance, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would win by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Unexpected Results

How was your night?

I had to do that since they were adding around 200,000 votes into the system frequently! I was actually a little nervous at the beginning: The candidate led the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but there were two big batches of ballots added later and his lead went from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, it was possible where election day went kind of poorly for him, in which the opponent would have basically increasing his support from the earlier contest. However the winner added 500,000 supporters to his initial base, and this was critical why he succeeded. He went out and greatly broadened his support from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani get additional support from?

He built the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the earlier election. Additionally he boosted his core of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: multiracial, young, renters and residents struggling with costs

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It is a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Electors in immigrant strongholds that supported Trump last year went for Zohran now. However I wouldn’t say he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

A major development of the election was the sky-high turnout. Who did that help?

Both sides. Participation was significantly higher than I had expected. I thought we might go over two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a substantial opposition group, energized, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s favored to surpass half. He’s at just over 50% but remain around 200K ballots left to report at that time. So it’s not it’s definitive, but I think probable, and I hope he achieves it because afterwards none can claim Sliwa was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His support completely collapsed.

He lost a single precinct in any borough. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly surprised me. Cuomo held very white areas, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained many conservatives on Staten Island with a high participation. I believe there was significant tactical voting by the Republicans. This happened prior to Trump tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think existed some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, instance, the property owners and homeowners supported the independent. Thus there existed some opposition. However no, largely the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran prevailed – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

Prior to the vote we reported on if Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

Exist areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – like specific locales – where he did well. However in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Similarly in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored the independent. And also, there are newcomers from Eastern Europe in the borough, who were pretty staunchly Cuomo. Therefore I don’t know if existed major surprises here, but Mamdani did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city represents in politics? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key political leaders from progressives come from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – candidates will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

But I think that each urban center in America could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in America – since youth reside there, tenancy is common and they are places where individuals struggle by the inequalities we face.